<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;You had a good run&#8230;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/</link>
	<description>Candid Commentary from a Cable Curmudgeon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:24:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alvin Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Alvin Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 01:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cablewholesale.com/?p=15#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t dispute that some of the high end [whose vendors shall remain anonymous :-D ]cables BENCH MARK better performance, but is the difference REALLY discernible to the average human ear/eye? It peeves me that I can opt for a $5.00 HDMI cable, or a $50.00 HDMI cable, yet to my eyes, they both perform equally well. 

What ANNOYS me EVEN MORE SO is the fact that A/V cabling is generally unavailable in lengths under 24&quot;. HDMI, by it&#039;s very nature should eliminate cable clutter, since both video and audio connections are in one cable, but this advantage is negated since lengths under 6&#039; are impossible to find [at least in my experience]

IDEA: Someone invent/market a universal crimping tool which would accommodate RCA connectors, F Connectors, RG45 ends, etc. That way, a home theater system/home server system etc could be custom wired with only as much cabling as required, with no unsightly rats nest of cables to contend with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t dispute that some of the high end [whose vendors shall remain anonymous <img src='http://blog.cablewholesale.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  ]cables BENCH MARK better performance, but is the difference REALLY discernible to the average human ear/eye? It peeves me that I can opt for a $5.00 HDMI cable, or a $50.00 HDMI cable, yet to my eyes, they both perform equally well. </p>
<p>What ANNOYS me EVEN MORE SO is the fact that A/V cabling is generally unavailable in lengths under 24&#8243;. HDMI, by it&#8217;s very nature should eliminate cable clutter, since both video and audio connections are in one cable, but this advantage is negated since lengths under 6&#8242; are impossible to find [at least in my experience]</p>
<p>IDEA: Someone invent/market a universal crimping tool which would accommodate RCA connectors, F Connectors, RG45 ends, etc. That way, a home theater system/home server system etc could be custom wired with only as much cabling as required, with no unsightly rats nest of cables to contend with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MS</title>
		<link>http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>MS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cablewholesale.com/?p=15#comment-6</guid>
		<description>If I had a dollar for every person that told me the spent over $200 for mediocre cables... People need to do their homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had a dollar for every person that told me the spent over $200 for mediocre cables&#8230; People need to do their homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cablewholesale.com/?p=15#comment-5</guid>
		<description>But they&#039;re so pretty....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But they&#8217;re so pretty&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.cablewholesale.com/2009/06/25/you-had-a-good-run/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cablewholesale.com/?p=15#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Agreed, the retail prices on some of the cables out there are ridiculous.  I&#039;ve yet to see any evidence from third party tests that retail cables costing hundreds of dollars perform any better than cables costing 1/10th of the price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed, the retail prices on some of the cables out there are ridiculous.  I&#8217;ve yet to see any evidence from third party tests that retail cables costing hundreds of dollars perform any better than cables costing 1/10th of the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
